Blog Archives

Calandra Vargas: Courage and Constitutionality

CV 1-1

   There’s a revolving door in Washington. One elected officeholder’s go in, yet come out with legislative agendas still stored in memory on hardware inside their rolling laptop bags. Voided campaign promises and buckled leadership, they’re better known as the Republican Congressional majority that swept the 2014 Midterms; an election that was supposed to mean something.

   Republican candidate for Congress in Colorado’s 5th District, Calandra Vargas doesn’t settle for, or accept political party dysfunction.

   The crispness in Vargas’s message is knowing the landscape she’ll represent, an aggregate understanding of Conservative values, and true belief it is her duty to serve. That taking the best of Colorado to DC is more than a job, but a calling to pass along the working values and community spirit that define who she is and where she’s from. “My constituents will expect me to vote according to the policy priorities and values of our district [military, business, agriculture]. My constituents will also expect me to be an outspoken leader, to build a team with like-minded conservatives in DC, and to work hard to be an effective legislator.”

   An advocate in redefining the brand, Vargas is also committed to helping other Republicans get elected. On the national level, she strongly believes the GOP has to “articulate our values in a way that restores trust with voters and encourages more participation.”

   “Our current Republican Party is mostly composed of an older demographic that has never had to face the challenges that our generation has,” Vargas says, “and so they may not feel a need to or know how to reach out to younger Americans. Social attitudes will always shift; Republicans can use that to their advantage or they can refuse to adapt and miss opportunities that the Left will certainly capitalize on.”

   Reaching out in the public arena, Vargas believes women being prepared to fight for Conservative principles and providing them the tools needed in leadership roles in government is intrinsic, “The Left is going hard after the women’s vote and are succeeding because the Republicans have not had the foresight or political will to stand behind strong women.”

   As the media distorts reality and purposely downplays each Hillary Clinton impropriety, Vargas acknowledges that younger Americans may not have the knowledge to see through a woman like Clinton, yet they want to support equal rights and the first woman President so they will vote for her, adding, “what if there were more representatives like me who aren’t afraid to confront liberal women and give a different option to voters about views on women’s issues.”IMG_1945

   A 2014 Pew Institute Survey listed only 30% of millennials champion Republican values. Vargas believes she’s a voice that will help millennials distinguish not only where they stand politically, but their curiosity in answering serious questions like ‘what is the proper role of government?’

   Colorado politics is an intricate weave of ideological and sociological diversity. In a state with an image of being rural, one of the hardest sells to alliance-building was hot button topic, Colorado Amendment 64; the legalization of marijuana in January 2014 and the fallout/fall-in since.

    “Marijuana is a huge and complicated issue that Republicans cannot ignore or think that by being against marijuana that it will suddenly become illegal again,” Vargas says, “the majority of Colorado voters approve of marijuana, especially medical, and we need to pursue a realistic path forward from a regulatory point of view.”

   Her June 28th primary opponent Doug Lamborn, characterizes the kind of career politician Vargas vows never to become, an elected representative not only prone to pandering but possessing the kind of political gaffes that would make even Joe Biden proud. Lamborn, always a big PAC money recipient, has the notorious distinction of having once paid himself the interest from a campaign account.

   Vargas has strong views on America’s veterans, allocating more resources to their physical and mental rehabilitation. She is critical of Lamborn’s recent vote not allowing veterans access to medical marijuana. “Lamborn missed a huge leadership opportunity,” she said, “by voting down access to medical marijuana added insult to injury. Vets continue to be underserved or prescribed medications that are not sufficient for their well being.”

   “He [Lamborn] has the arrogance and ignorance to tell a doctor and his patient what kind of medicine they can or cannot use. He should have allowed access and required the VA to help set professional standards for the use and distribution of medical marijuana. I know several people with severe illness that benefit from medical marijuana; they are not pot-heads, they are ordinary people that want to find relief and healing and should be allowed to do so.”

   The horrific open slaughter at Orlando’s Pulse Nightclub, another bloody reminder of whether social networking caused, or was a lone wolf assault on America’s freedom, shows radical Islamic terrorism remains uncontained. Barack Obama is reticent to disparage the killer’s nationality. Instead he goes to war with proponents of the 2nd Amendment, turning the tragedy into another unsalable rant over gun control and his denial of the problem into talking points against Donald Trump and Republicans. Vargas states that “Obama doesn’t believe Islam is a problem, therefore refuses to fight Islamism that is happening on American soil.”

CV 3

   On America, Obama and the Democrat message the last eight years, Vargas believes the reset button has to be hit in DC, and in the political process, “Americans have to get involved and raise the standard for every aspect of politics and civil society, including what they believe about right and wrong and the role of government. We are in a culture war because people have very different ideas about right and wrong. Clearly, beliefs have consequences when they are communicated or forced through public policy, as we have seen under Obama.”

   Vargas understands Obama’s affinity to garner public support for him breaking the law, manufacturing a real or nonexistent crisis, targeting grassroots organizations among others in creating an enemy that doesn’t exist. On the beginning of life, Vargas, a deeply-rooted Christian says, “The Democratic Party as a whole shrouds murder of the unborn in the name of ‘women’s rights’ and believes that people who do not submit to their platform should be targeted by the IRS, sued for discrimination, or bullied into compromise. Ultimately it comes down to worldview, what you believe about truth, about God, about the identity of a human being and an individual’s relationship with others.”

   The One Hundred Fifteenth Congress Vargas plans being a member of has to step it up she says,“Congress is responsible to advocate for the virtues that make liberty the bedrock for societal prosperity and peace.”

   Actively promoting principles that make policies effective and serve the interests of the people within the boundaries of Constitutional values are paramount to Vargas. Cherishing morals, decency, hard work and personal responsibility are equally as important. “We cannot demand justice from our government if we do not have just laws nor can we overcome corruption if we do not hold ourselves to a higher standard.”

   Vargas’s long term plans include someday running a working ranch animal shelter “where people and animals can come to find a second chance, to heal, and enjoy life. That is my American dream, to keep waking up in a beautiful place, working outside, surrounded by those I love, even if they have four legs.”

   Until then, with a principled dynamism not found in her opponent, the focused-on-solutions approach of Calandra Vargas will be a much needed Conservative voice embodying Colorado in Washington, and with it, restoring America’s constitutionality.


The Last Word on Dithering

Early into his presidency, the Beltway buzzword describing Barack Obama’s protocol of protracted reaction was dithering. Dick Cheney went one better, terming it waffling as Obama’s dawdling response to the role of American troops in Afghanistan facing an emboldened enemy.

In Obama’s Keystone XL Dithering, US News and World Report columnist Mort Zuckerman wrote of the economic cost of non-implementing a transformative link to American energy independence.

Obama’s most damaging, if not intentional delay came during the two-years Democrats controlled both Houses. With the economy in free-fall,  Obama and the more hell-bent Nancy Pelosi, ramrodded, without one Republican vote, his paradigmatically-flawed signature healthcare program into law.

Obama and the State Department’s inaction and cover-up at the onset of  the senseless slaughter of  US Ambassador Chris Stevens and three others, are as British investigative writer James Boys points out in Two Weeks to a Presidency, [Obama’s] “dithering over the Benghazi tragedy has done little to inspire confidence. His inability to present a comprehensive strategy for the next four years, in over four hours of debates, is equally troubling.”

Dithering has been more aptly replaced by a more conventional description of how Obama thinks, acts, or chooses not to act; leading from behind. In Richard Miniter’s book of  the same name, a young, feral, impressionistic Obama is described as adopting the reactionary ascriptions of his mother, Stanley Ann Dunham. As president, Obama’s indecision and moodiness rely on the success or failures of female supporting players Pelosi, Hillary Clinton, and Valerie Jarrett.

While targeted phraseology promulgate the man and his failings, a second Obama term will further embolden a more disturbing, self-opportunistic pattern this president has already acted on; habitually skirting Congress to implement changes where he believes cooperation is lacking.

In bypassing formal legislation, Obama’s liberal agenda is predominant, witnessed in his executive fiat on welfare-to-work requirements; landmark legislation for its bipartisan efforts in 1996 under Bill Clinton.

The problem a Romney administration faces in rejuvenating the workforce stem from the hangers-on to Obama’s predilection that entitlement exists in being laconic, resentful and rooted in indignation; that welfare no longer represents failure, but failure to go out looking for or preparing for work is rewarded as a condition to receive aid.

Unable to bridge the separation of powers or reach across the aisle, Obama used authoritative action to personally overhaul the Dream Act. As Republicans consolidate their power in Congress after November 6th, an Obama replay would be more of the same, doing whatever it takes to get his way.

Resolute action is not in Obama’s repertoire. Little his defenders say about the number of times he was swift to act are pretentious. His self-proclaimed achievement of hanging Osama bin Laden’s head above his mantle was over 12 months in the making, and impossible without interrogatory information he chastised his predecessor’s tactics to attain.

One possible way for Obama to win reelection is for great numbers of voters to remain ignorant of the true natures of both party candidates on Election Day.

If enough of the nation’s electorate grasp a moderateunderstanding of the differences between these men, Americans will choose someone who acts fast and purposeful on his directives. It will usher in a new era of economic prosperity and resolve, because Mitt Romney is a man who will not dither. There’s simply no time.



%d bloggers like this: